A bird defecated on Joe Biden while the Democrat politician was reportedly rambling through a speech in Menlo, Iowa. The splatter of the bird feces can be seen on Biden’s sportcoat in the left shoulder region. The bird seemed to echo the sentiments of the American public.
“That bird speaks for anyone who’s filled their tank or gone shopping in the last 18 months,” stated Don Trump Jr., son of the recent Republican President Donald J. Trump.
Did a bird just poop on Joe Biden? pic.twitter.com/p2Ywv8CbRU
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 12, 2022
NATIONAL FILE recently reported on how the Biden administration could be creating trouble in the natural environment. As we wrote: The Joe Biden regime’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has quietly signed off on a Bill Gates-funded company’s effort to release genetically modified mosquitoes into the air in Florida and California. The vaccine-pushing Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funds Oxitec, which purportedly tries to introduce mosquitoes into the population that can stop mass reproduction of certain mosquito species. But now an organization called GMO/Toxin Free USA says that the Biden EPA is “abandoning safety concerns expressed by scientists, public health experts and environmental groups.”
GMO/Toxin Free USA stated: “On Monday, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved Oxitec’s Experimental Use Permit (EUP) to extend and expand experiments of Genetically Modified Mosquitoes (GMMs), abandoning safety concerns expressed by scientists, public health experts and environmental groups. The experiments by the for-profit British corporation would involve releases of an estimated 1.5 billion GMMs in Monroe County, FL, and 2.5 billion GMMs in Stanislaus, Fresno, Tulare, and San Bernardino Counties in California. The EUP allows Oxitec to experiment through April 30, 2024. Notable scientists have repeatedly exposed flaws and concerns with Oxitec’s GMO Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. The company has a concerning history of misrepresentation or failure in all other venues where they have experimented, followed by purposeful efforts to cover up those issues and attack the researchers who publish unfavorable findings.”